Last week
I've published a video explaining the Typological Model of Narrative Situations by Franz Karl Stanzel,
one of the most important theories in narratology and part of the basics in literary studies. At least, this is the case for
Germany.
Well, in
that video I mentioned something my senseis at university would have hated me
for: I said that knowing this model is important for both readers and
authors, since it helps us to understand literature better as well as to write
our own prose. The "problem" with this statement is that literary
studies are about analyzing texts and not about giving guidance how to write
them. And yet ... One of the reasons why I've studied literature is that I
wanted to learn the depths of this art genre in order to improve my own
writing.
As far as
I'm concerned, in the US you can actually study creative writing. In Germany
you can't. Over here you can "only" become a highly educated scholar
who has spent years researching great masterpieces of literature and their
historical and cultural contexts. Yet I don't believe I've missed anything. In
fact, I believe that studying literature helped me more that studying
creative writing would have.
Learning by Analyzing
When
learning any art the best thing you can possibly do is to learn from the
masters. And the
best way to learn from the masters is to analyze their artworks: How did
they achieve a certain effect? What do they do to convey emotions? How do they
structure their artworks? And so on ...
The great
thing about actual academic research is that as a student you are taught how
to use your tools. You can analyze artworks without any academic knowledge,
of course, but I doubt such analyses would be as deep as academic ones.
When I was
still in school I did analyze literature I liked on my own. And from my today's
standpoint I'd say I did it pretty well for my age. I wrote many fanfiction
reviews back then and some authors even said I analyzed their stories deeper
than even they could have done it. So when I went to university I was already
pretty experienced and - without any false modesty - I was one of the best in
my year. But I still had much to learn, I discovered, as there is so much
more about literary analysis than one is taught in school.
Back in
school I was taught that there is a first-person narrator, a third-person
narrator and an omniscient narrator. At university I've learned that every narrator
is a first-person narrator. If I don't use the word "I" when
telling a story it doesn't mean I'm not an "I" who judges
subjectively, doesn't know everything and may even be a liar. This
realization alone opened countless new ways to understand texts I had believed
to know everything about. And this is only one example for how studying
literature has changed my way to read texts.
Learning by Broadening Your Horizons
Another
great thing about academic study is that it forces you to spend a lot of time
with your respective art genre. If you study visual arts you find yourself looking at paintings. A lot.
If you study music you listen to music. A lot. If you study literature you have
to read. A lot.
Of course,
it's not like you can't do it on your own at home, but - firstly - at home
lurks laziness, and - secondly and more importantly - university
broadens your horizons. At home it's very likely you'll only view,
listen to or read what you know and like. At university, however, you won't
have another choice than sometimes deal with artworks that aren't exactly
your taste at first glance, but later you'll learn how to appreciate or
even love them.
Moreover,
the German academic education is meant to prevent students from becoming
"Fachidiots" - i.e. specialists who don't know anything beyond
their own field. So being a student of Slavic literature I also found myself
making presentations on William Wilson by Edgar Allan Poe and The
Steadfast Tin Soldier by Hans Christian Andersen. And going even further, I
also had some seminars in which I've learned some basics about movie theory.
Einsensteins's Montage of Attractions and the Kuleshov effect - I've learned about them while studying literature. Even gaming ... I actually
had the chance to dive a little into game studies!
Every
time my horizons were broadened I got new, fresh ideas. What do writers from other cultures
write about and why? What are the differences? The similarities? What am I influenced
by and what can I learn from others? And ... Can the Kuleshev effect be used in
prose as well? Can you make a work of literature interactive?
In other
words: Education is one of the best sources for inspiration and innovation.
See also my post on originality.
"Real" Academic Education vs. Creative Writing Courses & Co.
Would I have
learned all that by studying creative writing? I honestly don't know, as I
don’t have it in my experience. And creative writing courses are certainly all
very different. So if I see a constructive issue with creative writing it would
be that I feel writing is often reduced to being a mere craft: "Oh,
you want to write a suspenseful and emotional scene? Follow these steps and
it'll turn out great!"
It's a
false promise. Whether it turns out great or not depends solely on the author
and not the steps he's following. Is it any use if you know the handicraft
side of your art but don't have an in-depth understanding of its history,
cultural contexts and relationship with other art genres? The result of
mere handicraft writing might still turn out a bestseller, but will it be
actually good from an aesthetical point of view?
I'm not
saying creative writing courses are bad. I really don't know. I'm just quite
sceptical about the idea. Above all, studying literature has taught me to
question everything other people say, including the way they understand literary artworks. It has taught me that there is no truth, no right or
wrong interpretation, and that the possibilities have no limits. It
has taught me to think and analyze independently, as I was encouraged
to criticize the old masters as well as prominent thinkers and to look
for new ways of seeing things.
Learning
the handicraft side of an art genre is important. As a matter of fact, drawing books and
tutorials have helped me a lot to improve my drawing skills. This is why
creative writing courses - and courses for other art genres - do have
a very good right to exist. But I have the impression that there are
many people out there who think that joining a course will make them a great
writer, artist or musician. The truth is: A course alone won't do it. If
you want to get better at your art genre you have to dive deeper into it. You
have to learn about it everything you can. Because this is passion.
Now what
about you? Did you study? How much time do you spend learning about your art
genre? Did you make any experiences with courses? Share them in the comments!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.